US Commerce cleared an empty-shell firm to buy Nvidia H200 chips
Per the NYT investigation of Nov 7, New Matrix — 17 months old, its registered office an empty shell — was cleared to buy Nvidia H200s, exposing a vetting gap.

The Commerce Department approved a 17-month-old Chinese company, New Matrix, to take delivery of Nvidia H200 AI chips — and when New York Times reporters visited its registered address in a recently built industrial park on Beijing’s northwest edge, they found a hollow gray room with wires dangling from the ceiling where light fixtures should be. The building directory doesn’t list the company, and the park’s property-management staff had no record of it. The Verge picked the story up on November 7, with Crypto Briefing and The Tech Buzz adding the H200 timeline and the responses. The story is not about the chip; it is about whether anyone is running the due diligence behind each H200 export license.
Key points
- New Matrix is about 17 months old and has almost no digital footprint; on the NYT’s site visit its registered office was an empty shell, absent from the building directory and unknown to the industrial park’s property management.
- Per the NYT, the owners behind this cleared H200 buyer have ties to a Chinese private-equity firm the US government has blacklisted since 2024; Commerce and Nvidia have not explained how vetting passed.
- Per Crypto Briefing’s timeline, Beijing approved roughly 400,000 H200s in January for Alibaba, ByteDance and Tencent on conditions, and about 600,000 H200s sat in Hong Kong awaiting Chinese import approval as of early November.
Background
The H200 gate opened on December 8, 2025, when Washington allowed Nvidia to resume China sales in exchange for a share of revenue going to the US government — Crypto Briefing puts the share at 25 percent, while The Verge, recapping the policy arc, cites 15 percent, the figure attached to the earlier H20 deal. The two outlets have not reconciled the number, so we present both. From mid-January 2026, Commerce moved Nvidia chip exports to case-by-case licensing, with Entity List screening as the gatekeeping layer; in the same month, Beijing conditionally approved about 400,000 H200s for Alibaba, ByteDance and Tencent. The license regime sits between two stories we have covered: enforcement, in the DOJ arrest over a $300 million A100/H100 smuggling chain, and accommodation, in China’s reported plan to approve RTX Pro 5500 purchases by ByteDance and Alibaba. New Matrix was approved earlier in 2026 as an assembler that builds H200s into AI systems, per Crypto Briefing — precisely the compliant-intermediary layer the case-by-case system was designed to produce.
The facts
The verifiable specifics come from four November 7 accounts, all tracing back to the NYT’s reporting (paywalled, so details below are attributed as “per the NYT”):
- The company: per the NYT, New Matrix is about 17 months old with almost no online trail; its registered room in the Beijing industrial park is a “hollow gray shell” with wires hanging where light fixtures should be. The site visit found no employees and minimal corporate records; the building directory omits it and the park’s property-management receptionist and manager had no record of the firm.
- The role: per Crypto Briefing, New Matrix’s approved business is assembling H200s into AI computing systems.
- The ties: per the NYT (relayed by The Verge), its owners are connected to a Chinese private-equity firm blacklisted by the US on national-security grounds since 2024.
- The responses: per The Tech Buzz’s summary, Commerce declined to comment on the approval; Nvidia did not explain its customer vetting and has announced no audit of other approved buyers; neither BIS nor Nvidia’s compliance team appears to have visited the address before the transfers were cleared.
- The scale: H200 China sales were under 1 percent of Nvidia’s data-center revenue in the July 2026 quarter (Crypto Briefing), yet about 600,000 H200s are stacked in Hong Kong awaiting Chinese import approval — a cleared shell intermediary is a hole in exactly that pipeline.
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | PE firm tied to New Matrix’s owners blacklisted by the US | NYT via The Verge |
| Dec 8, 2025 | US allows H200 sales to China for a revenue share (25% per Crypto Briefing; The Verge cites 15%) | Crypto Briefing / The Verge |
| Jan 2026 | Beijing conditionally approves ~400,000 H200s (Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent) | Crypto Briefing |
| Mid-Jan 2026 | Commerce moves to case-by-case export licensing | Crypto Briefing |
| Nov 7, 2026 | NYT publishes the empty-office investigation | NYT |
What others say
The Verge’s reading is the bluntest: this is a pattern, not an isolated lapse — companies connected to entities under national-security trade restrictions keep getting cleared. Crypto Briefing adds the market reaction: gray-market AI server prices are already rising, and it expects US officials may revisit New Matrix’s approval; nothing had been announced at publication. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has consistently stressed compliance while warning that overly broad export controls could fragment the global tech ecosystem, as The Tech Buzz recaps — the lobbying campaign that helped loosen the policy is now attached to questions about who the policy lets buy. Neither Commerce nor Nvidia answered the questions on the record, and that silence is itself part of the reporting.
Our take
The lesson here is about license execution, not chip specs: if an empty office clears Entity List screening and takes delivery of H200s, the case-by-case regime adds little control over what existed before it — a blacklist is a database, and due diligence requires someone to actually run it. Expect congressional questions and an internal Commerce review; for buyers, the real risk is retroactive tightening, and the ~600,000 H200s in Hong Kong are the exposure. Two disclosures on our side: every core fact rests on one paywalled investigation, so the blacklist ties and office details are attributed claims we could not verify independently; and the NYT headline says “firms”, plural, while no follow-up outlet has named the second shell company. The enforcement gap also feeds the homegrown-chip argument on both sides — see DeepSeek’s Ascend-oriented open components for where China’s fallback is heading.